i don't know what they are or gender or sexual preferences or religion. i don't know anything about that. i'm a capitalist. i'm here to serve them to make a buck and generate some profitability. to me that's the crux of this issue. >> you couldn't win your case. based on the facts you just described you would not be able to win your case because you have no sincere religious belief and no burden on that belief. >> then how would we know or why do we even want to know? maybe i should ask that question. >> that's why these cases have only come up with participants in same sex marriage ceremony. that's different than serving somebody in a restaurant. there has never been a case where somebody was allowed to refuse to serve at a restaurant because of some religious belief. it just hasn't happened. what has happened are wedding bakers and photographers and the like. it would be like saying should a catholic videographer be forced to participate in making a film promoting abortion? of course not. you have a right to not participate in that film. this tweaking o